April 9, 2012
bookshop:

resplendentri:

bramblepatch:

areyoutryingtodeduceme:

misskass:

#OH MY GOD #THAT BOOK IS A HARDCOVER #WHY ARE YOU HIGHLIGHTING IN THE BOOK?! #WHY ARE YOU WRITING IN THE BOOK?! #WHY ARE YOU DEFACING THAT BOOK #WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE TO YOU?!

oh you would punch me if you saw my copies of Harry Potter. After the 3rd book, I learned to buy two copies of each at each midnight premier. I’d have one hard bound first edition copy to keep nice and pristine and lovely, and another copy I can drag around everywhere, bend pages, high light, and write notes in. I love those books so much.

As far as I’m concerned, a book that you cannot highlight, write in, or dogear, use too-thick a bookmark in or press flowers in the back cover of, stuff in an over-full backpack or read while eating, is equivalent to a doll you cannot take out of the box. Nice as a status symbol, if you’re into that sort of thing. Maybe valuable enough that it should be carefully preserved for future generations to have similarly policed access to it. But it’s not being used for the kind of personal enjoyment I think of when I think book.

I’m afraid I have to respectfully disagree. While yes, I have dragged around, thrown around, bent, ripped (accidentally), used too thick a bookmark in, shoved in an overfull backpack, read while eating, and generally abused many a book in my lifetime, and I do consider that part of giving it life, I draw the line at taking one’s own pen/highlighter to the pages themselves. If you feel like something is noteworthy, write it down in your own notebook. I guarantee if you’re highlighting from a series and you want that particular quote, it would be ten times easier to have a notebook full of your favourite quotes for that series. And as for cheeky margin comments like the above? It’s not funny. It’s not cute. It’s something that, the next time you pick up the book, you’re probably going to erase. It’s adding your own words to something that you supposedly enjoy so much, and imo it undermines the words already on the page.
I apply this philosophy even to the most boring textbooks, as well. If I want to remember something, I take notes in a notebook. And then scribble all over the margins, and highlight, dog ear, what have you. I write down page numbers so I don’t forget, and if I have to go back for more info then I open the book again.
I enjoy books and I use books by reading them, not writing in them.

Dude. When I was in music school, my music history class featured a lecture on the history of chant and documents from monasteries that had survived from the early Medieval period through to today; and I will never forget this because my initial thought was, “DUDE, THIS IS JUST LIKE FANDOM.”
Basically, monks used to write irreverent notes in the margins of documents while they transcribed them. Sometimes these would be arguments/disagreements with the subject they were working on, like informal footnotes/editorial notes; but sometimes they’d just be totally off-topic, even jokes and monastery gossip addressed to other monks working on the project. Like the equivalent of medieval note-passing-in-the-sanctuary.
So there are all these PRISTINE ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPTS of Gregorian chants and other priceless historical artifacts that basically served as the 10th-century equivalent of a sharpie meeting a blank bathroom stall wall.
Never, ever apologize for the urge to break out the highlighter and write all over your text. :D

One word: marginalia.

bookshop:

resplendentri:

bramblepatch:

areyoutryingtodeduceme:

misskass:

#OH MY GOD #THAT BOOK IS A HARDCOVER #WHY ARE YOU HIGHLIGHTING IN THE BOOK?! #WHY ARE YOU WRITING IN THE BOOK?! #WHY ARE YOU DEFACING THAT BOOK #WHAT HAS IT EVER DONE TO YOU?!

oh you would punch me if you saw my copies of Harry Potter. After the 3rd book, I learned to buy two copies of each at each midnight premier. I’d have one hard bound first edition copy to keep nice and pristine and lovely, and another copy I can drag around everywhere, bend pages, high light, and write notes in. I love those books so much.

As far as I’m concerned, a book that you cannot highlight, write in, or dogear, use too-thick a bookmark in or press flowers in the back cover of, stuff in an over-full backpack or read while eating, is equivalent to a doll you cannot take out of the box. Nice as a status symbol, if you’re into that sort of thing. Maybe valuable enough that it should be carefully preserved for future generations to have similarly policed access to it. But it’s not being used for the kind of personal enjoyment I think of when I think book.

I’m afraid I have to respectfully disagree. While yes, I have dragged around, thrown around, bent, ripped (accidentally), used too thick a bookmark in, shoved in an overfull backpack, read while eating, and generally abused many a book in my lifetime, and I do consider that part of giving it life, I draw the line at taking one’s own pen/highlighter to the pages themselves. If you feel like something is noteworthy, write it down in your own notebook. I guarantee if you’re highlighting from a series and you want that particular quote, it would be ten times easier to have a notebook full of your favourite quotes for that series. And as for cheeky margin comments like the above? It’s not funny. It’s not cute. It’s something that, the next time you pick up the book, you’re probably going to erase. It’s adding your own words to something that you supposedly enjoy so much, and imo it undermines the words already on the page.

I apply this philosophy even to the most boring textbooks, as well. If I want to remember something, I take notes in a notebook. And then scribble all over the margins, and highlight, dog ear, what have you. I write down page numbers so I don’t forget, and if I have to go back for more info then I open the book again.

I enjoy books and I use books by reading them, not writing in them.

Dude. When I was in music school, my music history class featured a lecture on the history of chant and documents from monasteries that had survived from the early Medieval period through to today; and I will never forget this because my initial thought was, “DUDE, THIS IS JUST LIKE FANDOM.”

Basically, monks used to write irreverent notes in the margins of documents while they transcribed them. Sometimes these would be arguments/disagreements with the subject they were working on, like informal footnotes/editorial notes; but sometimes they’d just be totally off-topic, even jokes and monastery gossip addressed to other monks working on the project. Like the equivalent of medieval note-passing-in-the-sanctuary.

So there are all these PRISTINE ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPTS of Gregorian chants and other priceless historical artifacts that basically served as the 10th-century equivalent of a sharpie meeting a blank bathroom stall wall.

Never, ever apologize for the urge to break out the highlighter and write all over your text. :D

One word: marginalia.

(Source: soofuckinartsy)

3:18pm
  
Filed under: reblog! books 
February 18, 2011
Sasha Wants More: seattlebooks: “Medical history tells us of the case of a man living...

seattlebooks:

“Medical history tells us of the case of a man living under the peculiar delusion that he was a fried egg. Quite how or when this idea had entered his head, no one knew, but he now refused to sit down anywhere for fear that he would “break himself” and “spill the yolk.” His doctor tried sedatives and other drugs to appease his fears, but nothing seemed to work. Finally, one of them made the effort to enter the mind of the deluded patient and suggested he should carry a piece of toast with him at all times, which he could place on any chair he wished to sit on, and hence protect himself from spillage. From then on, the deluded man was never seen without a piece of toast handy and was able to continue a more or less normal existence.”

This lovely, profound style - I wish to marry it. ♥

7:00pm
  
Filed under: reblog! books 
February 12, 2011
The Darwin Awards 3 by Wendy Northcutt: natural selection — saving the genepool one idiot at a time

(Darwin Awards are bestowed upon individuals who improve our gene pool by removing themselves from it in a spectacularly stupid manner.)

1:30pm
  
January 16, 2011
On the reading list…

I almost always read a number of books all at the same time until I get too engrossed in one of them and put off finishing the rest. In this case, I’m almost done with The Darwin Awards 3, since it’s just a collection of really, really short stories about people who are too dumb to even consider their own safety. Pretty sure I sounded like a douche-bag but there’s no other way to describe the book.

[read more]

11:14am
  
Filed under: books reading list book blog 
January 15, 2011
my book blog: impractical book hoarder

Finally, I’m done — it’s a little sparse but I can now concentrate on my reviewing.

November 8, 2010
whereeveryoneisabookworm:

(The book cover is that of the e-book’s, I think. I can’t a large  enough picture of the cover of the copy that I have)
I’ve always had a  fondness for the bloody and the gruesome, which my bookshelves would  probably reveal to you, so it’s about damn time that I own up that I  like medical thrillers. Granted that I’ve only been reading books by  Tess Gerritsen but that’s how I feel. It’s a sort of guilty pleasure of  mine, along with food and men sexing up men (however, that last bit is a  story for a different time and different circumstance as the book to be  discussed contains none of that whatsoever).
The Apprentice, from what  I can understand, is the second book in the Jane Rizzoli series, a  sequel of sorts to The Surgeon. My favorite so far, actually. I  think it’s bloody brilliant and a lot more disturbing than the latter  and not as half-assed as The Mephisto Club, the sixth book most  likely. Yes, I haven’t read the books in order – go sue me. I just buy  what I can find; her books aren’t as widespread as, let’s say, James  Patterson’s, which you can find anywhere.
In a nutshell, the book  follows the case similar to one Detective Rizzoli had solved, the serial  killer (aptly christened as The Surgeon) behind bars. It is similar in  that that the present serial killer uses the same MO as The Surgeon and  the only difference is that the current one targets couples instead of  single women. What is already a complicated case is made harder with the  presence of FBI lingering in the background, plus someone unwanted  makes a surprise visit. How Rizzoli (my favorite character after J. D.  Robb’s Lieutenant Dallas) had toughed it out is grade A+ – major bitches  rule, you know. The description, however crude, is stated outright by  the Detective herself, thank you very much. Another character who I love  is Dr. Maura Isles, who was introduced in this book. Everyone considers  her the ice queen and she’s no-nonsense, calm, and collected in terms  of personality.
Gerritsen’s writing style is a thing to love. It’s a  gem and it reminds me of Thomas Harris’. Particularly in his Hannibal  books. There was that “don’t put me down and keep on reading” effect  because the whole thing was provocative and suspenseful. I quite agree  with the critics – it’s really that good. Case in point, Tess  Gerritsen’s books were turned into a television series, “Rizzoli &  Isles,” with Angie Harmon (Lindsey Boxer in the television adaptation of  James Patterson’s Women’s Murder Club) as Rizzoli and Sasha Alexander (Caitlin Todd in NCIS) as Dr. Isles.
If you’re looking for a read that will keep you up at night,  wanting to devour the book whole, something different from your usual  reads (that depends, though), give this a try. Who knows? It might be  worth your time.
Note: The current layout does not show bullets at all - just so you know. :)

whereeveryoneisabookworm:

(The book cover is that of the e-book’s, I think. I can’t a large enough picture of the cover of the copy that I have)

I’ve always had a fondness for the bloody and the gruesome, which my bookshelves would probably reveal to you, so it’s about damn time that I own up that I like medical thrillers. Granted that I’ve only been reading books by Tess Gerritsen but that’s how I feel. It’s a sort of guilty pleasure of mine, along with food and men sexing up men (however, that last bit is a story for a different time and different circumstance as the book to be discussed contains none of that whatsoever).

The Apprentice, from what I can understand, is the second book in the Jane Rizzoli series, a sequel of sorts to The Surgeon. My favorite so far, actually. I think it’s bloody brilliant and a lot more disturbing than the latter and not as half-assed as The Mephisto Club, the sixth book most likely. Yes, I haven’t read the books in order – go sue me. I just buy what I can find; her books aren’t as widespread as, let’s say, James Patterson’s, which you can find anywhere.

In a nutshell, the book follows the case similar to one Detective Rizzoli had solved, the serial killer (aptly christened as The Surgeon) behind bars. It is similar in that that the present serial killer uses the same MO as The Surgeon and the only difference is that the current one targets couples instead of single women. What is already a complicated case is made harder with the presence of FBI lingering in the background, plus someone unwanted makes a surprise visit. How Rizzoli (my favorite character after J. D. Robb’s Lieutenant Dallas) had toughed it out is grade A+ – major bitches rule, you know. The description, however crude, is stated outright by the Detective herself, thank you very much. Another character who I love is Dr. Maura Isles, who was introduced in this book. Everyone considers her the ice queen and she’s no-nonsense, calm, and collected in terms of personality.

Gerritsen’s writing style is a thing to love. It’s a gem and it reminds me of Thomas Harris’. Particularly in his Hannibal books. There was that “don’t put me down and keep on reading” effect because the whole thing was provocative and suspenseful. I quite agree with the critics – it’s really that good. Case in point, Tess Gerritsen’s books were turned into a television series, “Rizzoli & Isles,” with Angie Harmon (Lindsey Boxer in the television adaptation of James Patterson’s Women’s Murder Club) as Rizzoli and Sasha Alexander (Caitlin Todd in NCIS) as Dr. Isles.

If you’re looking for a read that will keep you up at night, wanting to devour the book whole, something different from your usual reads (that depends, though), give this a try. Who knows? It might be worth your time.

Note: The current layout does not show bullets at all - just so you know. :)

5:08pm
  
Filed under: reblog books 
October 25, 2010
Bottom: A book I’ve read.
Top: What I’m reading right now.

Bottom: A book I’ve read.

Top: What I’m reading right now.

4:54pm
Filed under: books 
October 18, 2010
Book Meme

1. What author do you own the most books by?
Bob Ong (a Filipino author), Carolyn Keene, J. D. Robb, Tess Gerritsen, Jeffery Deaver, and of course, J. K. Rowling.

2. What book do you own the most copies of? 
I don’t really have more than 1 copy of a book because that’s excessive, imo. Only by accident do I buy more than 1 copy of the same book when I can’t remember that I already have it.

3. Did it bother you that both those questions ended with prepositions?
Not really.

4. What literary character are you secretly in love with?There’s plenty - man, I could go on and on. But for the most part, I love Harry Potter, Blaise Zabini, Fred and George Weasley, Draco Malfoy, Severus Snape, and Lucius Malfoy; Anne Rice’s Lestat; and Laurie from Little Women.

5. What book have you read the most times in your life? 
The Harry Potter books, the Death Note light novel, and Bob Ong’s ABNKKBSNPLAko?

6. Favorite book as a ten year old? 
I can’t really remember - I wish I can say I was reading Nancy Drew at that age but I could have been reading a Jeffery Deaver book for all I know. I used to be a big reader of Childcraft, though.

7. What is the worst book you’ve read in the past year? 
The Mephisto Club by Tess Gerritsen. Twilight by Stephanie Meyer.

8. What is the best book you’ve read in the past year?
The best books that I’ve read in the past year (since I find it hard to pick one) would be The Surgeon by Tess Gerritsen, Red Dragon and Hannibal Rising by Thomas Harris, and Little Women by Louisa May Alcott.
 
9. If you could force everyone you know to read one book, what would it be? 
I don’t know… Maybe any of the Harry Potter books since not everyone would appreciate my other books. Oh, maybe some Amy Tan - it could be The Hundred Secret Senses, The Bonesetter’s Daughter or The Kitchen God’s Wife. Maybe The Life of Pi. I can’t choose one.

10. What book would you most like to see made into a movie?
None at the moment.

11. What is the most difficult book you’ve ever read?
Dante’s Divine Comedy - I had to give it up because I didn’t really appreciate the translation.

12. What is your favorite book? 
I’ll have to go with Bones to Ashes by Kathy Reichs as my recent favorite.

13. What is your favorite play? 
I liked William Shakespeare’s ‘The Twelfth Night’ and ‘Romeo and Juliet.’

14. Poem?
I have a soft spot for Elizabeth Barret Browning’s Sonnet XLIII - otherwise known as the “How Do I Love Thee?” sonnet - from Sonnets from the Portuguese and Christopher Marlowe’s ‘The Passionate Shepherd to His Love.’

15. Essay? 
‘A Heritage of Smallness’ by Nick Joaquin.

16. Who is the most overrated writer alive today? 
Stephanie Meyer.

17. What is your desert island book? 
I don’t have one.

18. And … what are you reading right now?
J. D. Robb’s Ceremony in Death and Jane Austen’s Emma. I’m also thinking of reading Burnett’s A Little Princess.

10:08am
Filed under: books book meme 
October 18, 2010
The BBC apparently believes most people will have only read 6 of the 100 books here: BOLD THE ONES YOU’VE READ!

1 PRIDE AND PREJUDICE-JANE AUSTEN
2 THE LORD OF THE RINGS - JRR TOLKIEN
3 JANE EYRE - CHARLOTTE BRONTE
4 Harry Potter series-JK Rowling
5 To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee
6 THE BIBLE (I read some of it, does that count?)
7 WUTHERING HEIGHTS - EMILY BRONTE
8 Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell
9 His Dark Materials-Philip Pullman
10 GREAT EXPECTATIONS - CHARLES DICKENS
11 LITTLE WOMEN-LOUISA M ALCOTT
12 TESS OF THE D’URBERVILLES - THOMAS HARDY
13 Catch 22 - Joseph Heller
14 Complete Works of Shakespeare (I read some, again does that count? XD And anyway, they should be counted as separate books, you know.)
15 REBECCA - DAPHNE DU MAURIER
16 The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien
17 Birdsong - Sebastian Faulk
18 CATCHER IN THE RYE- JD SALINGER
19 The Time Traveller’s Wife - Audrey Niffenegger
20 MIDDLEMARCH - GEORGE ELLIOT
21 GONE WITH THE WIND - MARGARET MITCHELL
22 THE GREAT GATSBY- F SCOTT FITZGERALD
23 BLEAK HOUSE - CHARLES DICKENS
24 WAR AND PEACE - LEO TOLSTOY
25 The Hithch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy-Douglas Adams
26 Brideshead Revisited - Evelyn Waugh
27 CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY
28 Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck
29 ALICE IN WONDERLAND-LEWIS CARROLL
30 THE WIND IN THE WILLOWS-KENNETH GRAHAME
31 ANNA KARENINA - LEO TOLSTOY
32 DAVID COPPERFIELD - CHARLES DICKENS
33 Chronicles of Narnia-CS Lewis
34 EMMA - JANE AUSTEN
35 Persuasion - Jane Austen
36 The Lion,the Witch and the Wardrobe-CS Lewis
37 The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini
38 Captain Corelli’s Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres
39 Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden
40 Winnie the Pooh - AA Milne
41 Animal Farm - George Orwell
42 The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown
43 ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SOLITUDE- GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ (lol,universal literature 101)
44 A Prayer for Owen Meaney - John Irving
45 The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins
46 Anne of Green Gables-LM Montgomery
47 FAR FROM THE MADDING CROWD - THOMAS HARDY(oh those english lessons)
48 The Handmaid’s Tale - Margaret Atwood
49 Lord of the Flies - William Golding
50 Atonement - Ian McEwan
51 Life of Pi - Yann Martel
52 DUNE- FRANK HERBERT (proud of having read that series)
53 Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons
54 SENSE AND SENSIBILITY - JANE AUSTEN
55 A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth.
56 The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon
57 A TALE OF TWO CITIES - CHARLES DICKENS
58 Brave New World - Aldous Huxley
59 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time-Mark Haddon
60 LOVE IN THE TIME OF CHOLERA - GABRIEL GARCIA MARQUEZ
61 OF MICE AND MEN - JOHN STEINBECK
62 LOLITA-VLADIMIR NABOKOV
63 The Secret History - Donna Tartt
64 The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold
65 COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO-ALEXANDRE DUMAS
66 On The Road - Jack Kerouac
67 JUDE THE OBSCURE-THOMAS HARDY
68 BRIDGET JONES’S DIARY-HELEN FIELDING
69 Midnight’s Children - Salman Rushdie
70 MOBY DICK - HERMAN MELVILLE
71 OLIVER TtWIST- CHARLES DICKENS
72 Dracula - Bram Stoker.
73 The Secret Garden-Frances Hodgson Burnett
74 Notes From A Small Island - Bill Bryson
75 ULYSSES - JAMES JOYCE
76 The Bell Jar - Sylvia Plath
77 Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ransome
78 GERMINAL - EMILE ZOLA
79 VANITY FAIR - WILLIAM MAKEPEACE THACKERAY
80 Possession - AS Byatt.
81 A CHRISTMAS CAROL- CHARLES DICKENS
82 Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell
83 The Color Purple - Alice Walker
84 The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro
85 MADAME BOVARY - GUSTAVE FLAUBERT
86 A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry
87 Charlotte’s Web - EB White
88 The Five People You Meet In Heaven - Mitch Albom
89 ADVENTURES OF SHERLOCK HOLMES-SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE
90 The Faraway Tree Collection-Enid Blyton
91 HEART OF DARKNESS - JOSEPH CONRAD
92 THE LITTLE PRINCE - ANTOINE DE SAINT-EXUPERY
93 The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks
94 Watership Down - Richard Adams
95 A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole
96 A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute
97 THE THREE MUSKETEERS - ALEXANDRE DUMAS
98 HAMLET - WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE
99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - Roald Dahl
100 LES MISERABLES-VICTOR HUGO

I don’t get why some of the books listed even belong to this list. And boo you, BBC, once I’ve found copies of a lot of the books here, I’ll be able to bold out more! >8D

9:05am
Filed under: books 
August 29, 2010
Dork by Day, Nerd by Night: Talking about books and Kindles again.

Digital books, I think, are invented for the sole purpose of selfishness. No more curious person, pissing you off by pulling on side comments and spoilers when they see the cover of the book that you’re reading.

Other situation:

I’m reading porn lit on my iPad. I caught the attention of…

Well, the Kindle being more environmental-friendly than books is overrated BS. First of all, consider the production process of the device — comparing the Kindle and a book, which is more green when it comes to production and materials? Second, the batteries used for the Kindle to work are not going to last for forever — unless it works on solar power then fine. Third, paper is recyclable and the Kindle is not — when a newer and better device than the Kindle comes out, what would happen then?

So, sentimental reasons aside, I would still choose actual books that start to smell when they get old than a Kindle.

1:19pm
  
Filed under: reblog books Kindle